In societies where weak criminal justice systems, marginalization, and conflicting political interests prevent victims of gross human rights violation from seeking justice, international justice mechanisms exist to restore the rule of law by conducting investigations, bringing perpetrators to justice, and ensuring victims are provided with reparations for the harm done.
Amnesty International Philippines is committed in its work on promoting international justice by supporting the efforts of existing international justice mechanisms in demanding accountability for the most serious crimes committed in the country.
International Justice Mechanisms
The International Criminal Court
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a permanent, international criminal court that was established in 2002 to investigate and prosecute those who are in the highest echelons of power who have committed the most heinous crimes as stipulated on the Rome Statute: genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression. The ICC has conducted investigations in countries where national authorities fail to act on a certain crime, including the Philippines. As of now, the case filed before the ICC concerning the Philippines is still on the preliminary examination phase.
Ad hoc international criminal tribunals
Both created by the United Nations Security Council, the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda were created to address atrocities committed during the conflict in former Yugoslavia and the genocide in Rwanda.
Hybrid courts are created when the domestic justice system lack the necessary infrastructure, processes, and resources to properly investigate and prosecute serious crimes in countries that have gone through conflict or crisis. Hybrid courts have been established in countries of Cambodia, Sierra Leone, and Bosnia.
The Philippines at the ICC
In 2011, the Philippines ratified the Rome Statute and became the 117th member of the ICC. Civil society organizations and human rights advocates played an important role in campaigning for its ratification and bringing international justice mechanism to public attention.
In 8 February 8, the Office of the Prosecutor of the ICC announced that it will be opening the preliminary examination in the Philippines. The examination would cover the crimes allegedly committed by the State since 1 July 2016 during its conduct of the War on Drugs campaign by the current Philippine Government. Particularly, the ICC prosecutor has been examining cases of extrajudicial execution committed during anti-drug operations by the police.
The ICC prosecutor has been examining cases of extrajudicial execution committed during anti-drug operations by the police.
A month after the Office of the Prosecutor announced the opening of the Preliminary Examination which include looking into the possible criminal responsibility of the president himself, President Rodrigo Duterte announced the withdrawal of the Philippines from the Rome Statute.
As of 17 March 2019, the Philippines is no longer a member of the ICC, having submitted its withdrawal to the United Nations on 17 March 2018. According to article 127 of the Statute, withdrawal becomes effective a year after the deposit of notice of withdrawal to the United Nations Secretary-General. Crimes committed after the effectivity of the withdrawal will not anymore fall under the jurisdiction of the Court. However, the withdrawal from the Statue will have any impact on the ongoing preliminary examination of the Philippine situation at the ICC. The court can continue to examine and possibly investigate cases that occurred from 1 July 2016 to 16 March 2019.
On 14 June 2021, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda announced the conclusion of her office’s preliminary examination and her submission to the Court’s pre-trial chamber a request for a full investigation into the Situation in the Republic of the Philippines between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019.
In the request she maintains that they have reasonable basis to believe that the Crimes Against Humanity of Murder and Torture or Other Inhumane Acts as well as other crimes within the jurisdiction of the ICC has been committed from at least 1 July 2016 to 16 March 2019 within the context of the Philippine government’s “war on drugs.”
With the decision of the Office of the Prosecutor to request for a full investigation, the registry of the ICC under the supervision of the Victims Participation and Reparation Section (VPRS) opened the Victims Representation Process. As per the ICC framework, victims of crimes allegedly committed in the Philippines in the context of the War on Drugs campaign between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019 have the right to submit “representations” to provide their views, concerns, and expectations to the ICC judges who are reviewing the OTP’s request.
The process ended on 13 August 2021, which was the deadline set by the ICC judges of the Pre-trial Chamber I. On 27 August 2021, the Registry transmitted to the ICC judges 204 victims representations submitted on behalf of 1,530 individual victims and 1,050 families. On the public redacted report prepared by the VPRS, an overwhelming 94% of submissions fully supported the Prosecutor’s request to investigate. Victims who supported the request believe that the investigation stage will open a genuine investigation by an impartial international court, and that this will allow the victims’ and their families’ voices to be heard.
On 15 September 2021, the Pre-trial Chamber I has formally authorized the commencement of the investigation into the Situation in the Philippines, in relation to crimes allegedly committed in the Philippines between 1 November 2011 and 16 March 2019, in the context of the so-called ‘war on drugs’ campaign. Just 3 months after the Office of the Prosecutor requested authorization to launch an investigation.
Timeline: EJE victims’ road to justice
Read more on Amnesty International reports on the Philippine bloody ‘war on drugs’.